Side by sideSuburb comparison

Murrumba vs Esk.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Esk scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 16/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Murrumba (961) sits above Esk (954).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Murrumba edges out on average school ICSEA (961 vs 954).

Common questionsMurrumba vs Esk

Common questions

Does Murrumba or Esk have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Murrumba scores 961 vs 954 in Esk. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Murrumba or Esk?

Esk scores 16/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Murrumba
Metric
Esk

Price & Market

Median house
$558,750
Median unit
$205,920
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$260/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$221/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
16
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
11
Population
2,590
54
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
4
961
Avg ICSEA
954

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).