Side by sideSuburb comparison

Nabageena vs Trowutta.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Trowutta edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Trowutta (909) sits above Nabageena (886). Nabageena skews owner-occupied (79%), Trowutta runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Trowutta edges out on average school ICSEA (909 vs 886).

Common questionsNabageena vs Trowutta

Common questions

Does Nabageena or Trowutta have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Trowutta scores 909 vs 886 in Nabageena. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Nabageena
Metric
Trowutta

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$225/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$240/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
55.0%
29.0%
Renter occupied
23.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
34
Population
88
53
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
8
886
Avg ICSEA
909

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).