Your Property Guide

Napperby vs Bungama

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Napperby (916) sits above Bungama (908).

Buying in Napperby or Bungama?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Napperby? The free selling guide

Napperby and Bungama side by side

MeasureNapperbyBungama
Renting
House rent$350/wk–
Unit rent$250/wk–
Owner occupied86.0%83.0%
Renter occupied9.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby109
Average ICSEA916908
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population666116
Median age4444
Climate
Annual rainfall397 mm358 mm
Mean max, January32.7°C32.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Napperby edges out on average school ICSEA (916 vs 908). Bungama also has a higher family-household share (93% vs 74%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Napperby vs Bungama: common questions

Does Napperby or Bungama have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Napperby scores 916 vs 908 in Bungama. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Napperby and Bungama?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide