Side by sideSuburb comparison

Naracoorte vs Mount Light.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Naracoorte edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Naracoorte scores higher on walkability (34/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Mount Light skews owner-occupied (100%), Naracoorte runs more rental-dense (70% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Mount Light has a heavier family-household mix (96% vs 66%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsNaracoorte vs Mount Light

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Naracoorte or Mount Light?

Naracoorte scores 34/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Naracoorte
Metric
Mount Light

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$390/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$225/wk
$325/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
70.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

34
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
50
Bike score
0
6,211
Population
155
40
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
4
974
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).