Your Property Guide

National Park vs Fitzgerald

National Park scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in National Park or Fitzgerald?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in National Park? The free selling guide

National Park and Fitzgerald side by side

MeasureNational ParkFitzgerald
Renting
House rent$270/wk$270/wk
Unit rent$353/wk$230/wk
Owner occupied83.0%–
Renter occupied8.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby22
Average ICSEA891891
Lifestyle and people
Walk score20
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population80–
Median age45–
Climate
Annual rainfall1038 mm1247 mm
Mean max, January22.2°C20.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

National Park vs Fitzgerald: common questions

Which is more walkable, National Park or Fitzgerald?

National Park scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between National Park and Fitzgerald?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide