Naturi vs Chapman Bore

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Naturi (930) sits above Chapman Bore (929). Naturi skews owner-occupied (90%), Chapman Bore runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

Buying in Naturi or Chapman Bore?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Naturi? The free selling guide

Naturi and Chapman Bore side by side

MeasureNaturiChapman Bore
Renting
Owner occupied90.0%38.0%
Renter occupied30.0%63.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1313
Average ICSEA930929
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population2526
Median age4532
Climate
Annual rainfall370 mm353 mm
Mean max, January29.9°C30.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Naturi edges out on average school ICSEA (930 vs 929). Chapman Bore also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 80%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Naturi vs Chapman Bore: common questions

Does Naturi or Chapman Bore have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Naturi scores 930 vs 929 in Chapman Bore. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.