Side by sideSuburb comparison

Nebine vs Bindebango.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bindebango edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Bindebango scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 24/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Nebine skews owner-occupied (62%), Bindebango runs more rental-dense (30% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bindebango has a heavier family-household mix (90% vs 77%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsNebine vs Bindebango

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Nebine or Bindebango?

Bindebango scores 24/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Nebine
Metric
Bindebango

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$155/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$155/wk
$132/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$132/wk
62.0%
Owner occupied
30.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
24
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
29
Population
31
50
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

0
Schools nearby
1
Avg ICSEA
1008

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).