Side by sideSuburb comparison

Nirimba Fields vs Kings Langley.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,236,000 and $1,550,000.

Nirimba Fields (median $1,236,000) is roughly 20% cheaper to buy into than Kings Langley ($1,550,000). Over the past year, Kings Langley (+2.5%) ran 3.2 percentage points ahead of Nirimba Fields (-0.7%) on house-price growth.

Kings Langley scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Nirimba Fields (1077) sits above Kings Langley (1056). Kings Langley skews owner-occupied (86%), Nirimba Fields runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Nirimba Fields is the lower entry point at $1,236,000 median, 20% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Nirimba Fields delivers the better gross yield (1.89% vs 1.31%), but Kings Langley has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Nirimba Fields edges out on average school ICSEA (1077 vs 1056).

Common questionsNirimba Fields vs Kings Langley

Common questions

Is Nirimba Fields or Kings Langley cheaper to buy in?

Nirimba Fields has the lower median house price at $1,236,000, roughly 20% below Kings Langley ($1,550,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Nirimba Fields or Kings Langley?

Over the past 12 months, Kings Langley grew +2.5% vs -0.7% in Nirimba Fields, a gap of 3.2 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Nirimba Fields or Kings Langley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Nirimba Fields scores 1077 vs 1056 in Kings Langley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Nirimba Fields or Kings Langley?

Kings Langley scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Nirimba Fields or Kings Langley?

Gross rental yield on houses is 1.89% in Nirimba Fields vs 1.31% in Kings Langley. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Nirimba Fields
Metric
Kings Langley

Price & Market

$1,236,000
Median house
$1,550,000
$377,280
Median unit
$349,920
-0.7%
Annual growth (house)
+2.5%
Days on market

Rental

$450/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$390/wk
$410/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$500/wk
47.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
4
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
1,632
Population
9,354
31
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1077
Avg ICSEA
1056

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).