North Deep Creek vs Corella
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Corella (967) sits above North Deep Creek (960). Corella skews owner-occupied (123%), North Deep Creek runs more rental-dense (80% owner).
Buying in North Deep Creek or Corella?
Selling in North Deep Creek? The free selling guide
North Deep Creek and Corella side by side
| Measure | North Deep Creek | Corella |
|---|---|---|
| Renting | ||
| Owner occupied | 80.0% | 123.0% |
| Renter occupied | 14.0% | – |
| Schools | ||
| Schools nearby | 5 | 13 |
| Average ICSEA | 960 | 967 |
| Lifestyle and people | ||
| Population | 388 | 68 |
| Median age | 52 | 43 |
| Climate | ||
| Annual rainfall | 1063 mm | 1020 mm |
| Mean max, January | 30.7°C | 31.0°C |
Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.
Which suits whom
- For buyers
- We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
- For investors
- Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
- For families
- Corella edges out on average school ICSEA (967 vs 960). Corella also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 78%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
North Deep Creek vs Corella: common questions
Does North Deep Creek or Corella have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Corella scores 967 vs 960 in North Deep Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Keep comparing
The two suburbs
Compare North Deep Creek with
Choosing between North Deep Creek and Corella?
The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.