Side by sideSuburb comparison

Oatlands vs Stonor.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Oatlands scores higher on walkability (14/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Stonor (934) sits above Oatlands (906).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Stonor edges out on average school ICSEA (934 vs 906).

Common questionsOatlands vs Stonor

Common questions

Does Oatlands or Stonor have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Stonor scores 934 vs 906 in Oatlands. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Oatlands or Stonor?

Oatlands scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Oatlands
Metric
Stonor

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$188/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$160/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
Owner occupied
92.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

14
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,892
Population
47
52
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
10
906
Avg ICSEA
934

Climate

586 mm
Annual rainfall
586 mm
21.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
21.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).