Side by sideSuburb comparison

Oxley vs Yarrunga.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Yarrunga scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Oxley (1009) sits above Yarrunga (996).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Oxley edges out on average school ICSEA (1009 vs 996).

Common questionsOxley vs Yarrunga

Common questions

Does Oxley or Yarrunga have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Oxley scores 1009 vs 996 in Yarrunga. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Oxley or Yarrunga?

Yarrunga scores 12/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Oxley
Metric
Yarrunga

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$213/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$221/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
12
0
Transit score
0
50
Bike score
100
6,568
Population
19,214
48
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
13
1009
Avg ICSEA
996

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).