Parndana vs Macgillivray

Parndana scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Macgillivray skews owner-occupied (93%), Parndana runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

Buying in Parndana or Macgillivray?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Parndana? The free selling guide

Parndana and Macgillivray side by side

MeasureParndanaMacgillivray
Renting
House rent$350/wk–
Owner occupied71.0%93.0%
Renter occupied31.0%29.0%
Schools
Schools nearby11
Average ICSEA998998
Lifestyle and people
Walk score40
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population155117
Median age4337
Climate
Annual rainfall636 mm568 mm
Mean max, January25.1°C25.2°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Macgillivray has a heavier family-household mix (86% vs 63%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Parndana vs Macgillivray: common questions

Which is more walkable, Parndana or Macgillivray?

Parndana scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.