Side by sideSuburb comparison

Passchendaele vs Bapaume.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Passchendaele edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Passchendaele (949) sits above Bapaume (946). Bapaume skews owner-occupied (84%), Passchendaele runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Passchendaele edges out on average school ICSEA (949 vs 946). Passchendaele also has a higher family-household share (136% vs 92%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsPasschendaele vs Bapaume

Common questions

Does Passchendaele or Bapaume have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Passchendaele scores 949 vs 946 in Bapaume. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Passchendaele
Metric
Bapaume

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$95/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$185/wk
64.0%
Owner occupied
84.0%
27.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
42
Population
123
54
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
5
949
Avg ICSEA
946

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).