Pata vs Loxton North

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pata (995) sits above Loxton North (974).

Buying in Pata or Loxton North?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Pata? The free selling guide

Pata and Loxton North side by side

MeasurePataLoxton North
Renting
House rent–$550/wk
Unit rent–$225/wk
Owner occupied86.0%82.0%
Renter occupied–15.0%
Schools
Schools nearby45
Average ICSEA995974
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population81897
Median age5442
Climate
Annual rainfall269 mm262 mm
Mean max, January32.4°C32.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Pata edges out on average school ICSEA (995 vs 974).

Pata vs Loxton North: common questions

Does Pata or Loxton North have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pata scores 995 vs 974 in Loxton North. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.