Side by sideSuburb comparison

Pata vs Loxton North.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pata edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pata (995) sits above Loxton North (974).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pata edges out on average school ICSEA (995 vs 974).

Common questionsPata vs Loxton North

Common questions

Does Pata or Loxton North have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pata scores 995 vs 974 in Loxton North. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Pata
Metric
Loxton North

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$380/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$225/wk
86.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
81
Population
897
54
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
5
995
Avg ICSEA
974

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).