Side by sideSuburb comparison

Peacock Siding vs Wharps.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Peacock Siding edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Peacock Siding (927) sits above Wharps (925).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Peacock Siding edges out on average school ICSEA (927 vs 925).

Common questionsPeacock Siding vs Wharps

Common questions

Does Peacock Siding or Wharps have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Peacock Siding scores 927 vs 925 in Wharps. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Peacock Siding
Metric
Wharps

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$355/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
21.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
85
Population
10,923
41
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
8
927
Avg ICSEA
925

Climate

Annual rainfall
1036 mm
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).