Pine Hills vs Condamine

Condamine scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 12/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Condamine (955) sits above Pine Hills (945).

Buying in Pine Hills or Condamine?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Pine Hills? The free selling guide

Pine Hills and Condamine side by side

MeasurePine HillsCondamine
Renting
Owner occupied–65.0%
Renter occupied–23.0%
Schools
Schools nearby54
Average ICSEA945955
Lifestyle and people
Walk score012
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population10294
Median age3337
Climate
Annual rainfall548 mm560 mm
Mean max, January34.2°C34.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Condamine edges out on average school ICSEA (955 vs 945). Pine Hills also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 69%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Pine Hills vs Condamine: common questions

Does Pine Hills or Condamine have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Condamine scores 955 vs 945 in Pine Hills. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Pine Hills or Condamine?

Condamine scores 12/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.