Side by sideSuburb comparison

Pingaring vs Kuender.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Pingaring edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Pingaring (1012) sits above Kuender (986). Kuender skews owner-occupied (63%), Pingaring runs more rental-dense (45% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Pingaring edges out on average school ICSEA (1012 vs 986).

Common questionsPingaring vs Kuender

Common questions

Does Pingaring or Kuender have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Pingaring scores 1012 vs 986 in Kuender. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Pingaring
Metric
Kuender

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$163/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$163/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$153/wk
45.0%
Owner occupied
63.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
60
Population
41
46
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
1012
Avg ICSEA
986

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).