Side by sideSuburb comparison

Point Arkwright vs Mount Coolum.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Point Arkwright edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Point Arkwright (1057) sits above Mount Coolum (1049). Mount Coolum skews owner-occupied (69%), Point Arkwright runs more rental-dense (58% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Point Arkwright edges out on average school ICSEA (1057 vs 1049).

Common questionsPoint Arkwright vs Mount Coolum

Common questions

Does Point Arkwright or Mount Coolum have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Point Arkwright scores 1057 vs 1049 in Mount Coolum. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Point Arkwright
Metric
Mount Coolum

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$490/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$850/wk
$393/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$450/wk
58.0%
Owner occupied
69.0%
39.0%
Renter occupied
30.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

6
Walk score
6
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
309
Population
4,545
47
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
13
1057
Avg ICSEA
1049

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).