Side by sideSuburb comparison

Quambone vs Conimbia.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Conimbia edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Conimbia (922) sits above Quambone (826). Quambone skews owner-occupied (76%), Conimbia runs more rental-dense (33% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Conimbia edges out on average school ICSEA (922 vs 826). Quambone also has a higher family-household share (76% vs 56%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsQuambone vs Conimbia

Common questions

Does Quambone or Conimbia have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Conimbia scores 922 vs 826 in Quambone. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Quambone
Metric
Conimbia

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$190/wk
$80/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$154/wk
76.0%
Owner occupied
33.0%
15.0%
Renter occupied
44.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
128
Population
30
44
Median age
31

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
2
826
Avg ICSEA
922

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).