Side by sideSuburb comparison

Quanda vs Mount Tenandra.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Quanda edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Quanda (844) sits above Mount Tenandra (820). Quanda skews owner-occupied (157%), Mount Tenandra runs more rental-dense (67% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Quanda edges out on average school ICSEA (844 vs 820). Quanda also has a higher family-household share (114% vs 40%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsQuanda vs Mount Tenandra

Common questions

Does Quanda or Mount Tenandra have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Quanda scores 844 vs 820 in Mount Tenandra. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Quanda
Metric
Mount Tenandra

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$160/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$160/wk
$136/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$136/wk
157.0%
Owner occupied
67.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
19
Population
24
53
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
3
844
Avg ICSEA
820

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).