Queens Pinch vs Apple Tree Flat

Apple Tree Flat scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Apple Tree Flat skews owner-occupied (106%), Queens Pinch runs more rental-dense (54% owner).

Buying in Queens Pinch or Apple Tree Flat?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Queens Pinch? The free selling guide

Queens Pinch and Apple Tree Flat side by side

MeasureQueens PinchApple Tree Flat
Renting
House rent$650/wk$650/wk
Unit rent$450/wk$450/wk
Owner occupied54.0%106.0%
Schools
Schools nearby55
Average ICSEA942942
Lifestyle and people
Walk score02
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population4446
Median age4149
Climate
Annual rainfall789 mm732 mm
Mean max, January28.5°C29.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Apple Tree Flat has a heavier family-household mix (82% vs 69%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Queens Pinch vs Apple Tree Flat: common questions

Which is more walkable, Queens Pinch or Apple Tree Flat?

Apple Tree Flat scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.