Side by sideSuburb comparison

Quelagetting vs Ucarty.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Quelagetting edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Quelagetting (969) sits above Ucarty (954). Ucarty skews owner-occupied (88%), Quelagetting runs more rental-dense (38% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Quelagetting edges out on average school ICSEA (969 vs 954). Quelagetting also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 75%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsQuelagetting vs Ucarty

Common questions

Does Quelagetting or Ucarty have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Quelagetting scores 969 vs 954 in Ucarty. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Quelagetting
Metric
Ucarty

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$188/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$118/wk
$160/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$100/wk
38.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
32
Population
78
35
Median age
34

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
969
Avg ICSEA
954

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).