Side by sideSuburb comparison

Racecourse Bay vs Wye.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Racecourse Bay edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Racecourse Bay (958) sits above Wye (956). Wye skews owner-occupied (84%), Racecourse Bay runs more rental-dense (73% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Racecourse Bay edges out on average school ICSEA (958 vs 956). Racecourse Bay also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 84%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsRacecourse Bay vs Wye

Common questions

Does Racecourse Bay or Wye have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Racecourse Bay scores 958 vs 956 in Wye. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Racecourse Bay
Metric
Wye

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$220/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$240/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$180/wk
73.0%
Owner occupied
84.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
27
Population
95
53
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

17
Schools nearby
8
958
Avg ICSEA
956

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).