Side by sideSuburb comparison

Ranges Bridge vs Macalister.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ranges Bridge edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ranges Bridge (966) sits above Macalister (935).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ranges Bridge edges out on average school ICSEA (966 vs 935). Ranges Bridge also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 72%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsRanges Bridge vs Macalister

Common questions

Does Ranges Bridge or Macalister have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ranges Bridge scores 966 vs 935 in Macalister. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Ranges Bridge
Metric
Macalister

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$255/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
44.0%
Owner occupied
43.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied
45.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
98
Population
156
35
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
10
966
Avg ICSEA
935

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).