Side by sideSuburb comparison

Reedy Marsh vs Parkham.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Reedy Marsh edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Reedy Marsh (952) sits above Parkham (936). Reedy Marsh skews owner-occupied (93%), Parkham runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Reedy Marsh edges out on average school ICSEA (952 vs 936).

Common questionsReedy Marsh vs Parkham

Common questions

Does Reedy Marsh or Parkham have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Reedy Marsh scores 952 vs 936 in Parkham. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Reedy Marsh
Metric
Parkham

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$270/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
59.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
20.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
199
Population
111
53
Median age
31

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
5
952
Avg ICSEA
936

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).