Side by sideSuburb comparison

Renmark vs Renmark West.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Renmark edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Renmark scores higher on walkability (80/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Renmark West skews owner-occupied (85%), Renmark runs more rental-dense (57% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Renmark West has a heavier family-household mix (77% vs 61%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsRenmark vs Renmark West

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Renmark or Renmark West?

Renmark scores 80/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Renmark
Metric
Renmark West

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$410/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$450/wk
$290/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
57.0%
Owner occupied
85.0%
37.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

80
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
4,705
Population
1,358
44
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
962
Avg ICSEA
962

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).