Side by sideSuburb comparison

Renwick vs Mittagong.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Mittagong edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Renwick skews owner-occupied (82%), Mittagong runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Renwick has a heavier family-household mix (86% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Renwick
Metric
Mittagong

Price & Market

Median house
$1,120,311
Median unit
$684,750
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+18.0%
Days on market
42 days

Rental

$430/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$430/wk
$620/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied
27.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
92
Transit score
40
Bike score
5
1,453
Population
6,090
37
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
15
1043
Avg ICSEA
1043

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).