Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rifle Range vs Lowood.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lowood edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lowood (940) sits above Rifle Range (925). Rifle Range skews owner-occupied (82%), Lowood runs more rental-dense (62% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lowood edges out on average school ICSEA (940 vs 925).

Common questionsRifle Range vs Lowood

Common questions

Does Rifle Range or Lowood have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lowood scores 940 vs 925 in Rifle Range. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Rifle Range
Metric
Lowood

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$330/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$295/wk
82.0%
Owner occupied
62.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
85
197
Population
4,082
41
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
10
925
Avg ICSEA
940

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).