Rockhampton City vs Wandal

Rockhampton City scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 36/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Wandal skews owner-occupied (64%), Rockhampton City runs more rental-dense (42% owner).

Buying in Rockhampton City or Wandal?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Rockhampton City? The free selling guide

Rockhampton City and Wandal side by side

MeasureRockhampton CityWandal
Price and market
Median house$255,000–
Median unit$475,000–
Renting
House rent–$560/wk
Unit rent–$270/wk
Owner occupied42.0%64.0%
Renter occupied53.0%32.0%
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA945945
Lifestyle and people
Walk score10036
Transit score00
Bike score100100
Population2,0593,949
Median age4240
Climate
Annual rainfall717 mm728 mm
Mean max, January32.3°C32.1°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Wandal has a heavier family-household mix (62% vs 51%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Rockhampton City vs Wandal: common questions

Which is more walkable, Rockhampton City or Wandal?

Rockhampton City scores 100/100 on walkability vs 36/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.