Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rocks Crossing vs Caffreys Flat.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Rocks Crossing edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rocks Crossing (932) sits above Caffreys Flat (928).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Rocks Crossing edges out on average school ICSEA (932 vs 928).

Common questionsRocks Crossing vs Caffreys Flat

Common questions

Does Rocks Crossing or Caffreys Flat have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rocks Crossing scores 932 vs 928 in Caffreys Flat. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Rocks Crossing
Metric
Caffreys Flat

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$235/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$235/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$150/wk
Owner occupied
87.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
480
Population
53
48
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
932
Avg ICSEA
928

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).