Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rocky Gully vs Murray Bridge.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Murray Bridge edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Murray Bridge scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Rocky Gully skews owner-occupied (88%), Murray Bridge runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsRocky Gully vs Murray Bridge

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Rocky Gully or Murray Bridge?

Murray Bridge scores 8/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Rocky Gully
Metric
Murray Bridge

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$275/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$240/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
55.0%
10.0%
Renter occupied
40.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
5
113
Population
15,043
44
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
8
919
Avg ICSEA
919

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).