Roma vs Hodgson

Roma scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Hodgson skews owner-occupied (88%), Roma runs more rental-dense (51% owner).

Buying in Roma or Hodgson?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Roma? The free selling guide

Roma and Hodgson side by side

MeasureRomaHodgson
Price and market
Median house$340,000–
Median unit$365,000–
Renting
House rent$470/wk–
Unit rent$300/wk–
Owner occupied51.0%88.0%
Renter occupied45.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby22
Average ICSEA945945
Lifestyle and people
Walk score1000
Transit score00
Bike score1000
Population6,83895
Median age3535
Climate
Annual rainfall542 mm533 mm
Mean max, January34.6°C34.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Hodgson has a heavier family-household mix (75% vs 65%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Roma vs Hodgson: common questions

Which is more walkable, Roma or Hodgson?

Roma scores 100/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.