Your Property Guide

Round Swamp vs Capertee

Capertee scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Round Swamp skews owner-occupied (100%), Capertee runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

Buying in Round Swamp or Capertee?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Round Swamp? The free selling guide

Round Swamp and Capertee side by side

MeasureRound SwampCapertee
Renting
Owner occupied100.0%83.0%
Renter occupied–12.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1214
Average ICSEA919919
Lifestyle and people
Walk score02
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population11130
Median age6353
Climate
Annual rainfall720 mm700 mm
Mean max, January27.8°C28.0°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Round Swamp vs Capertee: common questions

Which is more walkable, Round Swamp or Capertee?

Capertee scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Round Swamp and Capertee?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide