Side by sideSuburb comparison

Rungoo vs Foresthome.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Foresthome edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Foresthome (923) sits above Rungoo (920). Rungoo skews owner-occupied (233%), Foresthome runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Foresthome edges out on average school ICSEA (923 vs 920).

Common questionsRungoo vs Foresthome

Common questions

Does Rungoo or Foresthome have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Foresthome scores 923 vs 920 in Rungoo. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Rungoo
Metric
Foresthome

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$252/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$214/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
233.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
11
Population
84
73
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
9
920
Avg ICSEA
923

Climate

Annual rainfall
1036 mm
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).