Side by sideSuburb comparison

Running Stream vs Palmers Oaky.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Palmers Oaky edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Palmers Oaky (941) sits above Running Stream (911). Palmers Oaky skews owner-occupied (77%), Running Stream runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Palmers Oaky edges out on average school ICSEA (941 vs 911). Palmers Oaky also has a higher family-household share (77% vs 56%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsRunning Stream vs Palmers Oaky

Common questions

Does Running Stream or Palmers Oaky have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Palmers Oaky scores 941 vs 911 in Running Stream. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Running Stream
Metric
Palmers Oaky

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$360/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$215/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$272/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
77.0%
7.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
120
Population
38
61
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
20
911
Avg ICSEA
941

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).