Side by sideSuburb comparison

Sancrox vs Thrumster.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Thrumster edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Thrumster (1004) sits above Sancrox (991). Sancrox skews owner-occupied (92%), Thrumster runs more rental-dense (68% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Thrumster edges out on average school ICSEA (1004 vs 991).

Common questionsSancrox vs Thrumster

Common questions

Does Sancrox or Thrumster have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Thrumster scores 1004 vs 991 in Sancrox. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Sancrox
Metric
Thrumster

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$385/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$460/wk
92.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
5.0%
Renter occupied
31.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
602
Population
2,382
45
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
20
991
Avg ICSEA
1004

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).