Sapphire vs Gemfields

Gemfields scores higher on walkability (10/100 vs 16/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

Buying in Sapphire or Gemfields?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Sapphire? The free selling guide

Sapphire and Gemfields side by side

MeasureSapphireGemfields
Schools
Schools nearby11
Average ICSEA884884
Lifestyle and people
Walk score1016
Transit score00
Bike score00
Climate
Annual rainfall554 mm580 mm
Mean max, January34.6°C34.6°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Sapphire vs Gemfields: common questions

Which is more walkable, Sapphire or Gemfields?

Gemfields scores 16/100 on walkability vs 10/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.