Scarness vs Wondunna

Scarness scores higher on walkability (30/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Wondunna skews owner-occupied (82%), Scarness runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

Buying in Scarness or Wondunna?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Scarness? The free selling guide

Scarness and Wondunna side by side

MeasureScarnessWondunna
Renting
House rent$570/wk$670/wk
Unit rent$420/wk$390/wk
Owner occupied55.0%82.0%
Renter occupied41.0%17.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1515
Average ICSEA970970
Lifestyle and people
Walk score300
Transit score00
Bike score10025
Population3,6463,315
Median age5140
Climate
Annual rainfall1018 mm1018 mm
Mean max, January30.4°C30.4°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Wondunna has a heavier family-household mix (86% vs 57%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Scarness vs Wondunna: common questions

Which is more walkable, Scarness or Wondunna?

Scarness scores 30/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Keep comparing

Choosing between Scarness and Wondunna?

The free buying guide: budget, schemes, inspections and how not to overpay.

Get the free buying guide