Scotts Point vs Clontarf

Clontarf scores higher on walkability (4/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Scotts Point (1011) sits above Clontarf (1007).

Buying in Scotts Point or Clontarf?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Scotts Point? The free selling guide

Scotts Point and Clontarf side by side

MeasureScotts PointClontarf
Schools
Schools nearby2020
Average ICSEA10111007
Lifestyle and people
Walk score46
Transit score00
Bike score100100
Climate
Annual rainfall1067 mm1067 mm
Mean max, January29.3°C29.3°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Scotts Point edges out on average school ICSEA (1011 vs 1007).

Scotts Point vs Clontarf: common questions

Does Scotts Point or Clontarf have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Scotts Point scores 1011 vs 1007 in Clontarf. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Scotts Point or Clontarf?

Clontarf scores 6/100 on walkability vs 4/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.