Seppeltsfield vs Greenock

Seppeltsfield scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Seppeltsfield (1012) sits above Greenock (1001). Greenock skews owner-occupied (89%), Seppeltsfield runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

Buying in Seppeltsfield or Greenock?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Seppeltsfield? The free selling guide

Seppeltsfield and Greenock side by side

MeasureSeppeltsfieldGreenock
Renting
House rent–$750/wk
Unit rent–$320/wk
Owner occupied75.0%89.0%
Renter occupied8.0%8.0%
Schools
Schools nearby67
Average ICSEA10121001
Lifestyle and people
Walk score20
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population1441,199
Median age4542
Climate
Annual rainfall498 mm509 mm
Mean max, January30.1°C29.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Seppeltsfield edges out on average school ICSEA (1012 vs 1001).

Seppeltsfield vs Greenock: common questions

Does Seppeltsfield or Greenock have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Seppeltsfield scores 1012 vs 1001 in Greenock. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Seppeltsfield or Greenock?

Seppeltsfield scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.