Side by sideSuburb comparison

Shaw vs Mount Louisa.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Shaw edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Shaw (932) sits above Mount Louisa (925). Mount Louisa skews owner-occupied (65%), Shaw runs more rental-dense (47% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Shaw edges out on average school ICSEA (932 vs 925).

Common questionsShaw vs Mount Louisa

Common questions

Does Shaw or Mount Louisa have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Shaw scores 932 vs 925 in Mount Louisa. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Shaw
Metric
Mount Louisa

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$355/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$570/wk
$322/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
47.0%
Owner occupied
65.0%
50.0%
Renter occupied
33.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
55
Bike score
55
760
Population
9,227
28
Median age
34

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
932
Avg ICSEA
925

Climate

1036 mm
Annual rainfall
1036 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).