Side by sideSuburb comparison

Skye vs Pines Forest.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Skye edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Skye scores higher on walkability (28/100 vs 18/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsSkye vs Pines Forest

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Skye or Pines Forest?

Skye scores 28/100 on walkability vs 18/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Skye
Metric
Pines Forest

Price & Market

$817,000
Median house
$559,000
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$380/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$315/wk
$323/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$268/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

28
Walk score
18
0
Transit score
10
100
Bike score
100
117,143
Population
5,711
33
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
989
Avg ICSEA
989

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).