Stokes Bay vs Cassini

Cassini scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 2/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Stokes Bay skews owner-occupied (90%), Cassini runs more rental-dense (70% owner).

Buying in Stokes Bay or Cassini?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Stokes Bay? The free selling guide

Stokes Bay and Cassini side by side

MeasureStokes BayCassini
Renting
Owner occupied90.0%70.0%
Renter occupied30.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby01
Average ICSEA–998
Lifestyle and people
Walk score02
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population5273
Median age4941
Climate
Annual rainfall579 mm514 mm
Mean max, January25.4°C25.8°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Stokes Bay has a heavier family-household mix (95% vs 78%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Stokes Bay vs Cassini: common questions

Which is more walkable, Stokes Bay or Cassini?

Cassini scores 2/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.