Side by sideSuburb comparison

Stone Well vs Tanunda.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tanunda edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Tanunda scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 54/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Stone Well skews owner-occupied (97%), Tanunda runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsStone Well vs Tanunda

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Stone Well or Tanunda?

Tanunda scores 54/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Stone Well
Metric
Tanunda

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$390/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$450/wk
97.0%
Owner occupied
75.0%
20.0%
Renter occupied
20.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
54
0
Transit score
0
10
Bike score
10
110
Population
4,710
46
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
9
1009
Avg ICSEA
1009

Climate

448 mm
Annual rainfall
448 mm
27.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
27.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).