Side by sideSuburb comparison

Surf Beach vs Batehaven.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Batehaven scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 32/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Surf Beach (935) sits above Batehaven (902).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Surf Beach edges out on average school ICSEA (935 vs 902).

Common questionsSurf Beach vs Batehaven

Common questions

Does Surf Beach or Batehaven have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Surf Beach scores 935 vs 902 in Batehaven. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Surf Beach or Batehaven?

Batehaven scores 32/100 on walkability vs 12/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Surf Beach
Metric
Batehaven

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$350/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$330/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
68.0%
Owner occupied
61.0%
28.0%
Renter occupied
36.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

12
Walk score
32
0
Transit score
0
30
Bike score
100
1,934
Population
1,911
53
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
5
935
Avg ICSEA
902

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).