Surrey Hills North vs Wattle Park.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Surrey Hills North edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Surrey Hills North scores higher on walkability (100/100 vs 42/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Surrey Hills North (1150) sits above Wattle Park (1143).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Surrey Hills North edges out on average school ICSEA (1150 vs 1143).
Common questions
Does Surrey Hills North or Wattle Park have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Surrey Hills North scores 1150 vs 1143 in Wattle Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Surrey Hills North or Wattle Park?
Surrey Hills North scores 100/100 on walkability vs 42/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Surrey Hills North against another suburb