Swans Lagoon vs Rangemore

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Rangemore (932) sits above Swans Lagoon (930).

Buying in Swans Lagoon or Rangemore?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Swans Lagoon? The free selling guide

Swans Lagoon and Rangemore side by side

MeasureSwans LagoonRangemore
Renting
Owner occupied100.0%–
Schools
Schools nearby48
Average ICSEA930932
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population12–
Median age29–
Climate
Annual rainfall697 mm690 mm
Mean max, January33.3°C32.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Rangemore edges out on average school ICSEA (932 vs 930).

Swans Lagoon vs Rangemore: common questions

Does Swans Lagoon or Rangemore have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Rangemore scores 932 vs 930 in Swans Lagoon. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.