Side by sideSuburb comparison

Taminick vs Mount Bruno.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Taminick edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Taminick (998) sits above Mount Bruno (997).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Taminick edges out on average school ICSEA (998 vs 997). Taminick also has a higher family-household share (65% vs 55%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsTaminick vs Mount Bruno

Common questions

Does Taminick or Mount Bruno have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Taminick scores 998 vs 997 in Mount Bruno. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Taminick
Metric
Mount Bruno

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
16.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
139
Population
47
48
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
13
998
Avg ICSEA
997

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).