Tecoma vs Belgrave.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $912,500 and $760,000. Belgrave edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Belgrave (median $760,000) is roughly 17% cheaper to buy into than Tecoma ($912,500).
Belgrave scores higher on walkability (76/100 vs 92/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Belgrave (1072) sits above Tecoma (1069).
For buyers
Belgrave is the lower entry point at $760,000 median, 17% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Belgrave edges out on average school ICSEA (1072 vs 1069).
Common questions
Is Tecoma or Belgrave cheaper to buy in?
Belgrave has the lower median house price at $760,000, roughly 17% below Tecoma ($912,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Does Tecoma or Belgrave have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Belgrave scores 1072 vs 1069 in Tecoma. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Tecoma or Belgrave?
Belgrave scores 92/100 on walkability vs 76/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Tecoma against another suburb