Side by sideSuburb comparison

Tenterden vs Denbarker.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Denbarker edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Denbarker (1009) sits above Tenterden (941). Denbarker skews owner-occupied (94%), Tenterden runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Denbarker edges out on average school ICSEA (1009 vs 941).

Common questionsTenterden vs Denbarker

Common questions

Does Tenterden or Denbarker have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Denbarker scores 1009 vs 941 in Tenterden. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Tenterden
Metric
Denbarker

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$160/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$220/wk
$160/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$125/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
94.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
240
Population
93
49
Median age
41

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
7
941
Avg ICSEA
1009

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).